New sex-ed curriculum gets mixed reviews from parents

Ontario’s new sex ed curriculum was unveiled Monday to mixed reviews from parents, with some lauding changes to the almost two-decade-old material as long overdue, and others vowing a showdown over what they consider age-inappropriate content.

Education Minister Liz Sandals expected some parental opposition but reiterated that the materials will be implemented this fall as planned.

“I anticipate there will be members of various religions who may object to one thing or another . . . but the curriculum is the curriculum that will be taught in Ontario schools,” said Sandals.

On Monday, the Liberals unveiled the first update to the province’s health curriculum since 1998. So antiquated was the existing syllabus that it did not even reflect the legalization of same-sex marriage in Canada more than a decade ago. The update also covers cyber safety, including sexting, as well as consent, and puts the curriculum in line with what’s being taught in other provinces.

Toronto mom Stephanie Baptist, a counsellor with Toronto Public Health, said it’s important to talk to kids about things like sexting in Grade 4 because even though they likely don’t have a cellphone, they do have access to devices “early, and often” — and often without supervision.

Parents, she added, will always play a role no matter what schools teach.

“Curriculum comes from the province — but the values always come from the family,” she said.
However, as many as 2,000 parents plan to protest outside Queen’s Park on Tuesday, upset at what they feel is too much information at too young an age, as well as a lack of meaningful parental consultation.

“My concern is about the process,” said Ziyad Mohamed, a Mississauga father of two young children who says religion has nothing to do with his concerns.

He also feels “the government has tried to demonize those who object” rather than listen to them.
In a telephone interview, Sandals said the curriculum underwent significant consultation with many groups over the years, and Premier Kathleen Wynne told reporters Monday the government is “very committed to this.”

Sandals said she has not labelled parents who object as zealots — that characterization has come from the media.

“We understand that parents are concerned and they want to know what their kids are learning,” she said, adding materials were created by experts and based on evidence.

The curriculum that will be in use in schools by this September is largely the same as what was proposed five years ago, then scrapped by then-premier Dalton McGuinty due to an outcry by a vocal minority of social conservatives.

Farina Siddiqui, co-ordinator of the Greater Toronto group Coalition of Concerned Parents, will take part in Tuesday’s protest and said it includes parents “of faith, of no faith — from every walk of life.”
“The ministry is calling us a fringe group. We are parents; we are the most important stakeholders in our children’s lives.”

Wynne, who has long championed a revised curriculum, told reporters everything in the update is “age appropriate” and “it’s done in a way kids can understand,” adding it’s important for kids as young as Grade 1 to learn about “different lifestyles and different family configurations.”

Jacki Yovanoff, a Waterloo mom of four, welcomed talk about consent and bullying, saying it builds on what she’s taught her own children about respecting their bodies and others’ bodies.

“I understand the concern — seeing (the terms) anal sex, oral sex in writing, especially in relation to elementary-age students takes you aback,” she said, adding that when you look at what is being taught at what age, the curriculum revamp makes sense given children’s experiences today.

As first disclosed by the Star’s Martin Regg Cohn on Sunday, the modernized curriculum is designed to keep kids safe from abuse by educating them.

Proper names for body parts and genitals will be taught in Grade 1 — something child-abuse investigators have long urged.

The first mention of the concept of same-sex relationships will be introduced to Grade 3 students.

Grade 4 students will learn about online safety, text messaging and “sexual pictures,” as well as puberty.

Grade 6 students will be taught what masturbation is and will learn about healthy relationships and consent.

Grade 7 students will be warned about the risks of “sexting” as well as informed about sexually transmitted diseases and oral and anal sex.

Sandals noted that if parents object to “this curriculum — or, quite frankly, science curriculum or English curriculum or any other piece of curriculum — the Education Act gives a parent of any religion or belief system the right to withdraw their child from that particular lesson.”

Methodology: 2016 Best Law Schools Rankings

The U.S. News rankings of 198 law schools fully accredited by the American Bar Association are based on a weighted average of the 12 measures of quality described below. Data were collected in fall 2014 and early 2015.
Specialty rankings are based solely on nominations by legal educators at peer institutions.
[See the Best Law Schools rankings.]
Quality assessment (weighted by 0.40)
Peer assessment score (0.25):
In fall 2014, law school deans, deans of academic affairs, chairs of faculty appointments and the most recently tenured faculty members were asked to rate programs on a scale from marginal (1) to outstanding (5). Those individuals who did not know enough about a school to evaluate it fairly were asked to mark "don't know."

A school's score is the average of all the respondents who rated it. Responses of "don't know" counted neither for nor against a school. About 58 percent of those surveyed responded.

Assessment score by lawyers/judges (0.15): In fall 2014, legal professionals, including the hiring partners of law firms, practicing attorneys and judges, were asked to rate programs on a scale from 1 (marginal) to 5 (outstanding). Those individuals who did not know enough about a school to evaluate it fairly were asked to mark "don't know." Names of those surveyed were provided to U.S. News by the law schools themselves.

A school's score is the average of all the respondents who rated it. Responses of "don't know" counted neither for nor against a school.

The three most recent years of the lawyer and judge surveys were averaged and weighted by 0.15. Assessment data were collected by Ipsos Public Affairs.

Selectivity (weighted by 0.25)

Median LSAT scores (0.125): These are the combined median scores on the Law School Admission Test of all 2014 full-time and part-time entrants to the J.D. program.

Median undergraduate GPA (0.10): This is the combined median undergraduate grade-point average of all the 2014 full-time and part-time entrants to the J.D. program.

Acceptance rate (0.025): This is the combined proportion of applicants to both the full-time and part-time J.D. program who were accepted for the 2014 entering class.

Placement success (weighted by 0.20)
Success is determined by calculating employment rates for 2013 grads at graduation (0.04 weight) and nine months after (0.14 weight), as well as the bar passage rate, explained below.

In recent years, enhanced American Bar Association reporting rules have led to a great deal more information becoming available from law schools about the many types of positions law students take after they graduate. Each year, the schools are required to report to the ABA how many of their most recent grads had various types of jobs lined up by nine months after graduation.

The ABA standards require the law schools to go into a great deal of detail by reporting 56 different job types, as well as employment status and duration. That includes, for example, whether each graduate's employment was long term – defined as lasting at least a year – or short term; was full time or part time; and whether it required passage of a bar exam.

U.S. News collected these same statistics when we surveyed the schools for our annual rankings, and we gathered the same data on members of the class who were employed at graduation. U.S. News also collected data on students' jobs when the law school was unable to determine length of employment or full- or part-time status, as well as when employment status was unknown.

For the third year in row, U.S. News incorporated this rich data into our computation of the employment measure for the class of 2013 at graduation and nine months later. Placement success was calculated by assigning various weights to the number of grads employed in 43 of these different types of post-J.D. jobs, employment statuses and durations.

MBA Programs Where Most Students Get Jobs

The U.S. News Short List, separate from our overall rankings, is a regular series that magnifies individual data points in hopes of providing students and parents a way to find which undergraduate or graduate programs excel or have room to grow in specific areas. Be sure to explore The Short List: College, The Short List: Grad School and The Short List: Online Programs to find data that matters to you in your college or grad school search.
Business school graduates can expect their degrees to boost them up the career ladder for many years to come.

The majority of business school alumni who graduated between 1959 and 2014 held midlevel positions one year after earning their degree, according to a February report from the Graduate Management Admission Council. Five years after graduation, most business school alumni were in senior-level positions or higher, the report states.

[Explore the U.S. News b-school programs and specialty rankings.]
Students who pursue an MBA, a degree that's designed to turn people into leaders, usually secure high-paying management jobs. At some schools, an entire class may find positions just months after completing their degree.

All of the full-time MBA students who graduated from the Collins College of Business at the University of Tulsa in 2014 were employed three months after graduation. Among 126 ranked business schools that submitted data to U.S. News, Collins had the highest percentage of full-time 2014 graduates who were employees within three months of graduating.
[Photos: See which graduate business schools are at the top of the rankings.]

Unlike last year, some of the highest-ranked MBA programs made this year's top 10 list for schools where students secured jobs within three months of graduating. The Booth School of Business at the University of Chicago, ranked No. 4, had 97.2 percent of 2014 graduates employed. Slightly more than 95 percent of 2014 graduates from the Wharton School at University of Pennsylvania, which is ranked No. 3, found a job three months after graduation.
The College of Charleston is new to this year's list and came close to topping it, with 97.1 percent of its full-time 2014 graduates employed three months after graduating. Of all the schools that submitted data, San Diego State University had the lowest percentage of students who were employed: 39 percent.

[Quiz: Are you ready to apply to an MBA program?]
Below is a list of the 10 schools with the highest percentage of full-time 2014 graduates who were employed three months after graduating. Unranked schools, which did not meet certain criteria required by U.S. News to be numerically ranked, were not considered for this report.

Business school (name) (state) Full-time MBA enrollment (fall 2014) Full-time MBA graduates employed three months after graduating in 2014 U.S. News b-school rank
University of Tulsa (Collins) (OK) 42 100% 83 (tie)
University of Chicago (Booth) 1,181 97.2% 4
College of Charleston (SC) 36 97.1% RNP*
Washington University in St. Louis (Olin) 281 96.9% 19
University of Pittsburgh (Katz) 161 96.2% 48 (tie)
Texas A&M University—College Station (Mays) 113 96.1% 27 (tie)
University of Washington (Foster) 248 95.8% 23
Michigan State University (Broad) 150 95.6% 37 (tie)
University of Pennsylvania (Wharton) 1,711 95.6% 3
University of Kansas 57 95.5% 88 (tie)

*RNP denotes an institution that is ranked in the bottom one-fourth of its ranking category. U.S. News calculates a rank for the school but has decided not to publish it.

Don't see your school in the top 10? Access the U.S. News Business School Compass to find employment data, complete rankings and much more. School officials can access historical data and rankings, including of peer institutions, via U.S. News Academic Insights.

U.S. News surveyed 464 schools for our 2014 survey of business programs. Schools self-reported myriad data regarding their academic programs and the makeup of their student body, among other areas, making U.S. News' data the most accurate and detailed collection of college facts and figures of its kind. While U.S. News uses much of this survey data to rank schools for our annual Best Business Schools rankings, the data can also be useful when examined on a smaller scale. U.S. News will now produce lists of data, separate from the overall rankings, meant to provide students and parents a means to find which schools excel, or have room to grow, in specific areas that are important to them. While the data come from the schools themselves, these lists are not related to, and have no influence over, U.S. News' rankings of Best Colleges, Best Graduate Schools or Best Online Programs. The employment data above are correct as of March 10, 2015.

U.S. News Releases 2016 Best Graduate Schools Rankings

Find out which schools came out on top for business, law, nursing and more.

Fewer U.S. citizens are headed to graduate school, and the decision not to go could put a dent in their paychecks.
First-time enrollment of U.S. citizens and permanent residents shrank by about 1 percent between fall 2012 and fall 2013, according to a September report from the Council of Graduate Schools. But a 2014 Pew Research Center analysis of the latest available salary data showed that median monthly earnings for young adults with master's degrees were 24 percent higher than for those with bachelor's degrees. Graduates with professional or doctoral degrees had earnings that were 51 percent higher.
For prospective students interested in the potential payoff and other benefits, figuring out where to go to graduate school, what to study and how to pay for it can take months. To help with those decisions, U.S. News has released the 2016 Best Graduate Schools rankings, which include admissions information for those aspiring to study law, business, medicine, education and engineering.
For the first time, U.S. News is also offering expanded rankings and data for nursing schools.
Graduate schools in these six disciplines, which are ranked annually, are evaluated on standardized test scores of newly enrolled students, employment outcomes of graduates and other criteria. The rankings methodology varies across disciplines to account for differences in each graduate program. The MBA rankings, for example, take into account the mean starting salary and bonus for graduates from full-time programs, while law schools are evaluated in part by the ratings of each program's quality by practicing lawyers and judges.
In one notable change to the law school methodology this year, U.S. News altered the way it evaluates students' success at landing jobs after graduation. Less weight was given to jobs for graduates if they were funded by the law school or the university.
[Video: See highlights of the new graduate schools rankings.]
Business: The Graduate School of Business at Stanford University took the No. 1 spot for top business schools, followed by Harvard Business School in second and the Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania in third.
Those three schools topped the rankings in a tie for first place last year. But other institutions moved significantly. Mays Business School at Texas A&M University rose 10 spots to No. 27, where it's tied with two other schools. Wake Forest University's business school, which tied for No. 58 in last year's rankings, leaped to a tie for No. 45.
Among part-time MBA programs, the University of California—Berkeley's Haas School of Business again took the No. 1 spot, followed by the Booth School of Business at the University of Chicago in second place and the Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University in third. The Fox School of Business and Management at Temple University saw one of the largest changes in the rankings, moving from a tie at No. 53 to a tie for No. 20.
[See photos of the 20 top-ranked business schools.]
Law: Yale Law School remained No. 1 among the top law schools, but there was some reshuffling among other schools. Harvard Law School kept the No. 2 spot, but had to share it with the law school at Stanford University.
The School of Law at the University of California—Irvine, which was not ranked last year, advanced to No. 30. The law school at Wake Forest University fell from No. 31, where it was tied with several other schools, to a tie for No. 47.

 

World Reputation Rankings 2015 results announced

The UK has increased its share of institutions in a global ranking of the world’s most prestigious universities.
The results of the Times Higher Education World Reputation Rankings 2015 show that the UK now boasts 12 of the 100 most renowned higher education institutions in the world (up from 10 last year), while its two strongest performers, the University of Oxford and the University of Cambridge, have improved their positions.
The University of Bristol entered the ranking this year in the 91-100 band, while Durham University and the University of Warwick entered the 81-90 group, although the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine dropped out. Both Cambridge and Oxford climbed two places, and are ranked second and third respectively. Scotland’s sole representative, the University of Edinburgh, climbed 17 places to 29th.
Vince Cable, the business secretary, said the findings illustrated “government efforts to support a world-class system that we can be proud of” but warned that other nations were “hot on our heels”. He said that was why the coalition had taken steps to “secure the reputation” of UK universities through greater fee income and removal of student number caps.
The US remains dominant in the annual rankings, claiming 43 of the top 100 universities and eight of the top 10, although the total number of American institutions is down from 46 last year.
For the fifth consecutive year, the rankings highlight an elite group of six US and UK “super-brands” that hold a significant lead over the rest. Although the order has changed over the years, the institutions in the top six have remained constant: Harvard University, Cambridge, Oxford, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Stanford University and the University of California, Berkeley.
“What we are finding year on year is that universities in this group of six tend to stand out well above the seventh- and eighth-placed institutions,” said THE rankings editor Phil Baty. “They seem to be in a super-league all of their own.”
Germany remains the best-represented nation after the US and the UK, with six top 100 universities (the same as last year). Its neighbour France now boasts five institutions in the table (all of them based in Paris), up from two last year.
Asia’s best performer, the University of Tokyo, slipped one place to 12th position. Meanwhile, China’s top institution, Tsinghua University, climbed 10 places to 26th, and Peking University leaped from 41st to 32nd place.
THE partnered with Elsevier to disseminate the Academic Reputation Survey on which the results are based. Questionnaires, which asked participants to nominate up to 10 of the best institutions in their field of expertise, were completed by some 10,000 academics selected to give a statistically representative sample of global scholars.
The survey was available in more languages than ever (15, up from 10 last year), and responses from more than 140 countries were received.


World Reputation Rankings 2015 results: top 10

2015 rank2014 rankInstitution
11Harvard University (US)
24University of Cambridge (UK)
35University of Oxford (UK)
42Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
53Stanford University (US)
66University of California, Berkeley (US)
77Princeton University (US)
88Yale University (US)
99California Institute of Technology (US)
1012Columbia University (US)